Which of the following are benefits of using a Pull CDN?

Increased load on the origin server

When a user requests content that is not present on an edge server in a Pull CDN, what happens next?

The edge server requests the content from the origin server and caches it.

The edge server directly serves the content from the origin server.

The user's request is redirected to the origin server.

A new edge server is provisioned to serve the request.

Pull CDNs avoid pre-populating edge servers with unnecessary content.

Push CDNs are more efficient for large, infrequently accessed files.

Push CDNs require less origin server bandwidth.

Pull CDNs have higher upfront setup costs.

The ability to handle a large number of concurrent viewers requesting popular videos from different geographical locations.

The speed at which new video uploads are processed.

The user interface design of the streaming platform.

The security of user account credentials.

Content may be stale on edge servers if caching policies are not configured correctly.

The origin server will always be overloaded.

Users will always experience high latency.

Edge servers will become full very quickly.

Implementing staggered cache invalidation or using techniques like cache warming.

Increasing the Time-To-Live (TTL) for cached content.

Removing all content from edge servers.

Directly connecting all users to the origin server.

It significantly decreases the bandwidth requirements.

It significantly increases the bandwidth requirements.

It has no impact on the bandwidth requirements.

It shifts bandwidth requirements to the edge servers.

Pull CDNs typically require less initial setup effort compared to Push CDNs for content distribution.

Detailed configuration of caching rules and TTLs is crucial for optimal performance.

The origin server is always the bottleneck in a Pull CDN architecture.

Pull CDNs are exclusively used for static assets like images and CSS files.

Pull CDN in System Design — Free MCQ Practice Test | testpaper.space